Skip to main content
Burning a token reduces its balance and supply. It does not by itself pay a seller or convey property title. A Brikk with a continuing proceeds claim should therefore not be burned to read a site update, attend an event, vote, or reserve a property. In the proposed whole-unit route, the buyer signs a property purchase agreement with a stated price. A Brikk holder may use a final, reconciled distribution entitlement as part of that price and pay any remainder in cash. The property purchase and distribution ledgers record the credit once. Only the claim actually used is consumed, after closing conditions are verified. Before a final entitlement exists, a reservation can use a reversible hold under explicit terms. If closing fails, the hold can be released under those terms. An estimated future payout is not cash already received by the project. “Burn a fixed number of tokens and get an apartment” would create an additional redemption promise. That promise needs its own asset reserve, pricing, and treatment of every other holder’s claim. It should not be added silently to a pooled proceeds model. See the current status for the gap between this proposed exchange and the current local burn handlers.